Audio Compression vs. Limiting

May 27, 2021

Audio Compression vs. Limiting: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Managing the dynamic range of an audio signal is an essential requirement for every modern music production project. Audio Compression and Limiting are two signal processing methods that both can help normalize dynamic range in different ways but in a similar process. While they function differently, their end goal is the same: to produce an optimal audio recording. Some may describe the difference as a subtle tweaking in level control while others feel one is better than the other. But which one is actually better? In this article, we will compare these two techniques and attempt to explain the benefits of each, free from any marketing talks, just the facts.

Definition

Both audio compression and limiting are dynamic range compression techniques. In simpler terms, both methods make the loudest sounds quieter and the quietest sounds louder, giving a more balanced dynamic range.

Audio Compression

Audio compression is the process of narrowing or reducing the range between the loudest and quietest parts of an audio signal. Compression makes soft sounds louder and loud sounds quieter, creating a more balanced and consistent mix. It helps to control the excessive dynamic range, so the sound is fuller and more even. In general, it assures that the quiet moments will be more evident and the loud moments won’t be ear-shattering.

Limiting

Limiting reduces the dynamics of an audio recording by controlling the level of a signal, preventing the louder sounds from exceeding a certain threshold level set by the user. The maximum output level will remain within the limit, hence the name. Limiters are commonly used to avoid clipping, which occurs when the audio signal is too high and exceeds the input capacity of the audio equipment.

Differences

Both audio compression and limiting are widely used techniques but have different benefits relative to each other. While these two audio signal processing methods are similar, some notable differences exist.

Purpose

Compression's main purpose is to control the dynamic range of an audio signal, which will bring out soft sounds and reduce louder ones. The primary function of a limiter is to control the level of the audio signal to prevent distortion, avoid clipping, and level out an audio recording.

Ratio

Ratio is the amount of gain reduction applied to the audio signal. The ratio determines the level of attenuation applied to the audio signal when it exceeds the Threshold (another control parameter of the processor). Finally, the ratio describes the compression amount. On the other hand, limiters typically have a ratio of 10:1 or more, a much more aggressive setting than most compressors to restrict the audio recording level.

Attack and Release Times

Audio compression typically has adjustable attack and release times to dial in more precise threshold control. Limiters, however, often incorporate extremely fast attack and release times, producing an instant and tightly controlled dynamic range.

Conclusion

In conclusion, audio compression and limiting are two different blending tools. Both methods play a crucial role in sound engineering, and the choice between one or the other (or both) may depend on a variety of factors, including the source material, musical style, and personal preference. Compression helps to create a more balanced and consistent mix, while limiting avoids distortion and clipping. So, before mixing your next track, take your time to determine which method suits your needs best. Always, experiment with different settings and monitor your sound quality to determine the optimal outcome.

Sources:


© 2023 Flare Compare